Question 12574

Plaats een reactie

Bevestigingscode

Typ enkel de gevraagde letters over. De code is niet hoofdlettergevoelig en bevat enkel letters.

Bevestigingscode
Smilies
:D :) :( :o :shock: :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:

BBCode staat AAN
[img] staat AAN
[url] staat AAN
Smilies staan AAN

Voorafgaande berichten
   

Weergave uitklappen Voorafgaande berichten: Question 12574

Question 3571

door Gae » Vandaag, 11:21

Vous approchez d'un virage dangereux, Pouvez vous dépasser un cycliste par la gauche sur la chaussée ?
La réponse est NON !!
Alors que dans la leçon 16, il n'est pas interdit de dépasser un cycliste, car ce n'est pas un véhicule à moteur à deux roues ???

Re: Question 12574

door Inazuma » 12 jan 2026, 13:51

GRO schreef: 01 dec 2025, 14:56 The correct answer is YES.
Only if the baker lives in that street

"Uitgezonderd plaatselijk verkeer" (except local traffic) does NOT allow a driver to enter said street to visit a shop, a school


Even the police no longer understand the concept and meaning of "plaatselijk verkeer"

Re: Question 12574

door Patrick » 04 jan 2026, 12:16

It is yes because as long as it isn't a pasthrough to another location but it is exactly the street where you need to be, you're allowed to enter.

Re: Question 12574

door GRO » 01 dec 2025, 14:56

The correct answer is YES.

Question 12574

door RS_2011 » 30 nov 2025, 19:27

The question is asking if you are allowed to enter a street with the "Uitgezonderd plaatselijk verkeer" plate if the baker is in that street. The correct answer should be "No", right? As you are only allowed to enter such a street if if you are in:

1. the vehicles of the residents of that street and of the visitors of these residents
2. the vehicles for delivering goods or maintenance or supervision.
3. the emergency vehicles and priority vehicles
4. and cyclists and moped riders.

But it says the correct answer is "yes".

Omhoog