door Inazuma » 31 jan 2020, 18:00
Gast schreef: 31 jan 2020, 16:35
Well my Theory lesson teacher is having a different view which stays that I have to stop .
I am wishing I should not get this question in my exam
Your theory teacher is wrong I'm afraid.
The traffic lights are working at the intersection
Which means the priority signs are not applicable - in accordance Art 6.3 first alinea:
https://wegcode.be/wetteksten/secties/k ... e/105-art6
6.3. Als de verkeerslichten op een bepaalde plaats werken gelden hier de verkeersborden betreffende de voorrang niet die op dezelfde weg geplaatst zijn.
(the second alinea contains a few exceptions to that, mostly on behalf of cyclists)
You still have to yield to other traffic though
If the light doesn't work - meaning a blinking central amber light-
Or if the bottom light is an amber blinking light instead of green, then he'd be right and you'd have to obey the priority signs ...
Print & show
[quote=Gast post_id=113580 time=1580484956]
Well my Theory lesson teacher is having a different view which stays that I have to stop .
I am wishing I should not get this question in my exam :D [/quote]
Your theory teacher is wrong I'm afraid.
The traffic lights are working at the intersection
Which means the priority signs are not applicable - in accordance Art 6.3 first alinea:
https://wegcode.be/wetteksten/secties/kb/wegcode/105-art6
[color=#0000FF]6.3. Als de verkeerslichten op een bepaalde plaats werken gelden hier de verkeersborden betreffende de voorrang niet die op dezelfde weg geplaatst zijn.[/color]
(the second alinea contains a few exceptions to that, mostly on behalf of cyclists)
[b]You still have to yield to other traffic though [/b] :!:
If the light doesn't work - meaning a blinking central amber light-
Or if the bottom light is an amber blinking light instead of green, then he'd be right and you'd have to obey the priority signs ... :wink:
Print & show